PULSE the living trend engine
🤖 Open Intelligence Dossier available for AI agents & citation View Markdown (.md) →
◼ Archived Business 🔮 PULSE predicts: fades by tomorrow — graded ✓ correct

Tesla Driver Tries the Old ‘I Wasn’t Driving’ Excuse to Get Out of Speeding Ticket

A Colorado driver blames Tesla’s Full Self-Driving mode after being caught speeding 64 mph in a 45 mph zone, sparking a fresh debate on autonomous-vehicle liability.

7sources
7articles
5velocity
+0%since first seen
57d agofirst detected

Velocity

How fast coverage is spreading — measured hourly from article rate × source diversity. How this works →

📍 How it ended

A Tesla driver in Colorado was caught traveling 64 mph in a 45 mph zone and claimed they were not driving due to the vehicle's self-driving technology. Police responded by reminding drivers that they remain responsible for self-driving vehicles.

The story quieted without a definitive conclusion in the coverage.

Epilogue added 55d ago, after coverage quieted.

The brief

TechRadar and Carscoops framed the story around the driver’s “I wasn’t driving” defense, noting the reliance on Tesla’s FSD feature. WFLA emphasized that the video “shows” the driver making the excuse, while CBS News added a police reminder that Colorado drivers remain responsible for the conduct of self‑driving vehicles. Gizmodo described the claim as an “old excuse” used to evade speeding tickets. The coordinated coverage underscores the newsworthiness of the legal tension between autonomous‑vehicle technology and existing traffic‑law enforcement.

Colorado law, as referenced by CBS, holds the licensed operator accountable for any violation, regardless of whether an advanced driver‑assistance system is active. This principle reflects a broader national conversation about how statutes apply to vehicles equipped with Autopilot, FSD or similar features that can control speed and steering. As manufacturers continue to roll out higher levels of automation, regulators and courts are being asked to define the boundaries of driver liability, making each citation a potential precedent. The next steps likely involve a hearing on the speeding ticket to determine whether the driver’s reliance on FSD can mitigate responsibility.

Coverage may later include a response from Tesla regarding the driver’s use of the feature and any guidance the company provides to owners about legal obligations. Observers will also watch for any statements from Colorado law‑enforcement agencies about how they intend to enforce traffic laws on vehicles operating in autonomous modes, and whether additional policy guidance will be issued.

Synthesized by PULSE from the headlines below under a strict no-invention contract. ✓ fact-checked: unsupported claims removed (77% supported) Updated 57d ago.

Quick answers

What speed was the Tesla recorded traveling?

The vehicle was recorded traveling at 64 mph in a zone limited to 45 mph.

Which law does police cite regarding driver responsibility?

Police cite Colorado law that holds the licensed operator responsible for violations even when an autonomous feature is active.

Which media outlets reported the incident?

The incident was reported by TechRadar, Carscoops, WFLA, CBS News, and Gizmodo.

Coverage (7)

Topics

Related trends

\n \n \n \n \n \n \n